http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/28/playing-games-for-all-the-wrong-reasons
http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/08/06/why-video-games-matter
dancash1808 wrote:Ah. well I can say it is applicable to me. at least some of the time. nasty spiral at times. but eh that was when I was little. I'm wiser now.... right? :roll:
Drascoll wrote:I actually hate both articles because they are leading the question and making large assumptions about an individuals self control. They imply powerlessness and empower games in a way that dose not exist as well as point out obvious conclusions about the gaming experience guessed as self discovery and deep personal growth where in reality it is just giving into the false pretense of "powerlessness" when it comes to self-will. Powerlessness is a dangerous believe that oppresses an individual and removes personal responsibly.
It was more then apparent to me at the age of eight that video games where a form of escapism where the reward process were influenced solely by determination and persistence, where as in life there is not only hard work at play but also happenstance(I wouldn't have used the words when I was young but it was clear). This is an essential formula to what makes games fun and is fundamentally understood by most. I don't need a IGN editorial to condescending to me about such basal assumptions. Where I take offence from the first article is where the author consigns his irresponsibility on to the nature of gaming. This is not empowering people this is purely a concession of the author of personal apathy and a failure to accept responsibly as a grown adult.
The second article is also arbitrary because the same thing can be said of any form of art whether it be movies, literature, music or paint. To aggrandize video games above the rest is a serviced to the potency of these other mediums as well as video games. In coloration to the first article it serves no purpose but to further inflate the idea that games hold power over others in some sort of subconscious addictive way.
TL;DR: Article one is false because the issue is self-control no video games. Article two is just propaganda to support the authors hypothesis in the first article.
Btw: My friend just introduced me to these forums. I've been lurking and I'm loving DSwiki Forums already.
edit: sorry for the spelling and the run on sentences. I'm a bit dyslexic to proofreading my own post is rather difficult at times.