Bunch of cowards...

Always blame the one who can ban you.

Reference case and point:

https://soulswiki.forumotion.com/t4547-the-tomb-of-giants-and-blaming-emergence-for-your-problems

Exactly. Just blame Patches.

Azran wrote:Exactly. Just blame Emergence.

Fixed it for you

I would include a pic of the old hero for added effect, but too much effort

Ok, Ok, DS players around the globe. I started this topic as a player, who disliked the persons whom heals themselves during the battle. Now, after studying quotes and texts from other players, i have reached the conclusion. I dont care anymore.

It is just of videogame, afterall.

It's the way of the internet.

If you win with a disadvantage, there is taunting.

If you lose with a disadvantage, there is hate mail.

Praise the Internet?

ALL HAIL THE INTERNET!

Turin wrote:Ok, Ok, DS players around the globe. I started this topic as a player, who disliked the persons whom heals themselves during the battle. Now, after studying quotes and texts from other players, i have reached the conclusion. I dont care anymore.

It is just of videogame, afterall.

Wisest thing I've heard all night

Well its not cool to use but them I believe if your enemy or you dont bow back then its an all or nothing match I use this mind set while in the forest and if im looking for a more honorable duel I look in the burg or Kilin.

I view my opponent healing during a battle as a victory. If my foe is forced to run off and heal, I don't chase him down. I count that exchange as my victory, heal myself if I need to, and start a new fight with the same opponent. Now, if he heals in the middle of battle, then that is my fault for letting him do it.

a +1 to you Blaine. I think the only thing I would add, in an effort to continue to beat a dead horse, is there are also two types of duels. One where both players understand the exact rules of the duel because they have some how been communicated to each other explicitly (fight club) and ones where both bow and they think they each know the rules but they both may have different ideas of the rules and therefore do not agree. The latter type typically results in no healing and that is about it. But some people bow to let you know they are ready to fight and will then heal. No big deal. They can play however they want.

What is this internets you all speak of?

They have the internet on computers now?

It'd be nice if people would just accept a loss. Not the end of the world...

is anyone else here experiencing deja vu?

Welcome to Dark Souls.. nothing is real, everything is permitted.

Now when you learn to accept this unfairness.. then you start to kick ***. Really.

Fog+WOT+WoG back in the days have no log-on. We deal with it by learning how to fight without log-on.

3v1? No problem.

I feel you on this dude but,

its Dark Souls. The developers did not set up rules to fight by, therefore, one should expect the worse, especially when they are invading. I dont mind when they heal, if they managed to get away from me to do it without losing their life, than it is our fault as invaders in my extremely humble DW opinion.

Hahalo wrote:Welcome to Dark Souls.. nothing is real, everything is permitted.

Now when you learn to accept this unfairness.. then you start to kick ***. Really.

Fog+WOT+WoG back in the days have no log-on. We deal with it by learning how to fight without log-on.

3v1? No problem.

Blarg, is that an Assassins' Creed line?

The game is relative in terms of fighting still from one to another. Unfairness exists, and TRUE fair is very hard to obtain. The best thing to do, is to have a little faith, a speck of intelligence, and nimble fingers.