+30
inksoldier
BigTuktuk
mankind
AHK-HK
ChizFreak
FinPeku
Lord of Ash
blackphantom08
exphilip2121
ssss_2_is_pwnage
Serious_Much
XachAttack
RANT
Forum Pirate
Rifter7
billy_bayonet
schultz
Demon Slayer
Gaxe
The Once-Ler
Spurgun
VeranoChico
WyrmHero
Glutebrah
robsthedon
Jovias-86
TehInfamousAmos
DamageCK
ViralEnsign_
reim0027
34 posters
FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°101
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
There's a difference between No Holds Barred, and Forest rules.
Serious_Much- Moderator Trainee
- Posts : 14641
Reputation : 287
Join date : 2012-01-17
Age : 31
Location : The Dark Side of the Moon
- Post n°102
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
reim0027 wrote:There's a difference between No Holds Barred, and Forest rules.
touche
billy_bayonet- Chosen Undead
- Posts : 5912
Reputation : 177
Join date : 2012-02-27
Age : 35
Location : ENGLAND!!!
- Post n°103
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Which one of you nancies wants a go then .....Hi reim!!!!!!!
WyrmHero- Lordvessel
- Posts : 8742
Reputation : 221
Join date : 2012-02-16
Age : 36
Location : The Painted World
- Post n°104
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
reim0027 wrote:Which rules do you want to ammend? The only thing in the SL 99 one that I disagree with are the no roll BS rule. The rest are OK.
Yeah the ones that I posted before everything ok except chains, etc.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°105
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
So, roll BS ok?
WyrmHero- Lordvessel
- Posts : 8742
Reputation : 221
Join date : 2012-02-16
Age : 36
Location : The Painted World
- Post n°106
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Yeah!
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°107
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Ok, I've updated the rules. I'll work on merging the threads later.
DamageCK- Hollowed
- Posts : 1768
Reputation : 64
Join date : 2012-04-15
Age : 38
Location : NC
- Post n°108
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Yeah, before we start adding/amending rules let's try to remember that at its core it's a "no rules" club. The more we start addressing what is or isn't allowed, the more it becomes like our other clubs, and we've already got those.
Last edited by DamageCK on Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:32 am; edited 1 time in total
RANT- Tyler Durden
- Posts : 7779
Reputation : 268
Join date : 2012-01-17
Location : Winterfell
- Post n°109
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
roll bs should be allowed, its kinda easy to counter and it will be harder to pull off with no dwgr.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°110
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
I hear you Dam. I reworded the rules to make it look cleaner.
I merged the FCs.
W - I need a name for your SL 99. I'm calling the 120: NHB120. What do you want to call your 99?
And, double check what I put in for the 99, make sure it is good.
I merged the FCs.
W - I need a name for your SL 99. I'm calling the 120: NHB120. What do you want to call your 99?
And, double check what I put in for the 99, make sure it is good.
WyrmHero- Lordvessel
- Posts : 8742
Reputation : 221
Join date : 2012-02-16
Age : 36
Location : The Painted World
- Post n°111
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Looks great, just call mine Arena.
WyrmHero- Lordvessel
- Posts : 8742
Reputation : 221
Join date : 2012-02-16
Age : 36
Location : The Painted World
- Post n°112
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
What do you guys think about allowing TWoP?
DamageCK- Hollowed
- Posts : 1768
Reputation : 64
Join date : 2012-04-15
Age : 38
Location : NC
- Post n°113
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
I'm cool. Do your thing.
You planning to TWoP and blast me with Soul Spears? Might have effed myself there. Haha.
You planning to TWoP and blast me with Soul Spears? Might have effed myself there. Haha.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°114
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Cool. Changed the name to the Arena.
robsthedon- Caffeinated
- Posts : 960
Reputation : 81
Join date : 2012-05-11
Location : Sussex
- Post n°115
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
If it's in the game it's fairWyrmHero wrote:What do you guys think about allowing TWoP?
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°116
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Yeah, I'm fine with TWoP. But, TWoP + projectiles/spells/miracles is not cool. TWoP with melee is fine, as there are numerous things that can be done to counter it.
robsthedon- Caffeinated
- Posts : 960
Reputation : 81
Join date : 2012-05-11
Location : Sussex
- Post n°117
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Do you think there is room for a FC that has no magic/pyro just shield and one weapon?
Spurgun- Chosen Undead
- Posts : 5553
Reputation : 119
Join date : 2012-01-29
Age : 27
Location : Finland!
- Post n°118
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Is attacking while someone is buffing allowed? and i TWoP considered a buff?
DamageCK- Hollowed
- Posts : 1768
Reputation : 64
Join date : 2012-04-15
Age : 38
Location : NC
- Post n°119
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
robsthedon wrote:Do you think there is room for a FC that has no magic/pyro just shield and one weapon?
I'm into pure melee clubs. I'm even into straight up, no gimmicks, melee only clubs. No casts, no damage rings, just sword and shield.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°120
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
During a fight, if they buff, grass, anything, they are fair game. Right now, TWoP is out. But, we are still discussing that and may include it. I'm for it with the exception of TWoP + projectile (including pyro, magic, and offensive miracles).
Spurgun- Chosen Undead
- Posts : 5553
Reputation : 119
Join date : 2012-01-29
Age : 27
Location : Finland!
- Post n°121
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
I think TWoP should be allowed and you should be allowed to use projectiles/magic with it. The animation is so long that the opponent deserves to be punished if he doesn't stop it mid fight.
DamageCK- Hollowed
- Posts : 1768
Reputation : 64
Join date : 2012-04-15
Age : 38
Location : NC
- Post n°122
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
I agree with that. ^ Basically, I'm for everything outside of chains and spell swapping. And healing.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°123
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
Technically, chains can be avoided too. There are 3 tactics. The first 2 are 50:50 chance of working (unless you study your opponent and know their chain tactic), the other one is 100% but requires you to tank a hit.
Spell swapping is out. No arguments there.
Spell swapping is out. No arguments there.
WyrmHero- Lordvessel
- Posts : 8742
Reputation : 221
Join date : 2012-02-16
Age : 36
Location : The Painted World
- Post n°124
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
If you're 2 handing your weapon you're f*cked. The only way is unlocking and doing nothing (maybe blocking) and I don't think it is fair at all. I only use chains in the forest because that's a war zone.
reim0027- Moderator
- Posts : 6715
Reputation : 381
Join date : 2012-01-28
- Post n°125
Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN
I agree. Personally, I'd rather not see Chain stabs or TWoP in duelling.
|
|