Souls Series Wiki Forums

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

+30
inksoldier
BigTuktuk
mankind
AHK-HK
ChizFreak
FinPeku
Lord of Ash
blackphantom08
exphilip2121
ssss_2_is_pwnage
Serious_Much
XachAttack
RANT
Forum Pirate
Rifter7
billy_bayonet
schultz
Demon Slayer
Gaxe
The Once-Ler
Spurgun
VeranoChico
WyrmHero
Glutebrah
robsthedon
Jovias-86
TehInfamousAmos
DamageCK
ViralEnsign_
reim0027
34 posters

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:31 am

    There's a difference between No Holds Barred, and Forest rules. silly
    Serious_Much
    Serious_Much
    Moderator Trainee
    Moderator Trainee


    Posts : 14641
    Reputation : 287
    Join date : 2012-01-17
    Age : 31
    Location : The Dark Side of the Moon

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by Serious_Much Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:41 am

    reim0027 wrote:There's a difference between No Holds Barred, and Forest rules. silly

    touche silly
    billy_bayonet
    billy_bayonet
    Chosen Undead
    Chosen Undead


    Posts : 5912
    Reputation : 177
    Join date : 2012-02-27
    Age : 35
    Location : ENGLAND!!!

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by billy_bayonet Sat Sep 15, 2012 10:52 am

    Which one of you nancies wants a go then silly.....Hi reim!!!!!!!
    WyrmHero
    WyrmHero
    Lordvessel
    Lordvessel


    Posts : 8742
    Reputation : 221
    Join date : 2012-02-16
    Age : 36
    Location : The Painted World

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by WyrmHero Sat Sep 15, 2012 12:44 pm

    reim0027 wrote:Which rules do you want to ammend? The only thing in the SL 99 one that I disagree with are the no roll BS rule. The rest are OK.

    Yeah the ones that I posted before everything ok except chains, etc.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sat Sep 15, 2012 2:27 pm

    So, roll BS ok?
    WyrmHero
    WyrmHero
    Lordvessel
    Lordvessel


    Posts : 8742
    Reputation : 221
    Join date : 2012-02-16
    Age : 36
    Location : The Painted World

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by WyrmHero Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:44 pm

    Yeah! big grin
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:55 pm

    Ok, I've updated the rules. I'll work on merging the threads later.
    DamageCK
    DamageCK
    Hollowed
    Hollowed


    Posts : 1768
    Reputation : 64
    Join date : 2012-04-15
    Age : 38
    Location : NC

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by DamageCK Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:56 pm

    Yeah, before we start adding/amending rules let's try to remember that at its core it's a "no rules" club. The more we start addressing what is or isn't allowed, the more it becomes like our other clubs, and we've already got those.


    Last edited by DamageCK on Sun Sep 16, 2012 12:32 am; edited 1 time in total
    RANT
    RANT
    Tyler Durden
    Tyler Durden


    Posts : 7779
    Reputation : 268
    Join date : 2012-01-17
    Location : Winterfell

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by RANT Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:15 pm

    roll bs should be allowed, its kinda easy to counter and it will be harder to pull off with no dwgr.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sat Sep 15, 2012 9:28 pm

    I hear you Dam. I reworded the rules to make it look cleaner.

    I merged the FCs.

    W - I need a name for your SL 99. I'm calling the 120: NHB120. What do you want to call your 99?

    And, double check what I put in for the 99, make sure it is good.
    WyrmHero
    WyrmHero
    Lordvessel
    Lordvessel


    Posts : 8742
    Reputation : 221
    Join date : 2012-02-16
    Age : 36
    Location : The Painted World

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by WyrmHero Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:00 pm

    Looks great, just call mine Arena.
    WyrmHero
    WyrmHero
    Lordvessel
    Lordvessel


    Posts : 8742
    Reputation : 221
    Join date : 2012-02-16
    Age : 36
    Location : The Painted World

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by WyrmHero Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:24 am

    What do you guys think about allowing TWoP?
    DamageCK
    DamageCK
    Hollowed
    Hollowed


    Posts : 1768
    Reputation : 64
    Join date : 2012-04-15
    Age : 38
    Location : NC

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by DamageCK Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:54 pm

    I'm cool. Do your thing.

    You planning to TWoP and blast me with Soul Spears? Might have effed myself there. Haha.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:23 pm

    Cool. Changed the name to the Arena.
    robsthedon
    robsthedon
    Caffeinated
    Caffeinated


    Posts : 960
    Reputation : 81
    Join date : 2012-05-11
    Location : Sussex

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by robsthedon Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:40 pm

    WyrmHero wrote:What do you guys think about allowing TWoP?
    If it's in the game it's fair
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:49 pm

    Yeah, I'm fine with TWoP. But, TWoP + projectiles/spells/miracles is not cool. TWoP with melee is fine, as there are numerous things that can be done to counter it.
    robsthedon
    robsthedon
    Caffeinated
    Caffeinated


    Posts : 960
    Reputation : 81
    Join date : 2012-05-11
    Location : Sussex

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by robsthedon Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:05 pm

    Do you think there is room for a FC that has no magic/pyro just shield and one weapon?
    avatar
    Spurgun
    Chosen Undead
    Chosen Undead


    Posts : 5553
    Reputation : 119
    Join date : 2012-01-29
    Age : 27
    Location : Finland!

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by Spurgun Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:09 pm

    Is attacking while someone is buffing allowed? and i TWoP considered a buff?
    DamageCK
    DamageCK
    Hollowed
    Hollowed


    Posts : 1768
    Reputation : 64
    Join date : 2012-04-15
    Age : 38
    Location : NC

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by DamageCK Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:17 pm

    robsthedon wrote:Do you think there is room for a FC that has no magic/pyro just shield and one weapon?

    I'm into pure melee clubs. I'm even into straight up, no gimmicks, melee only clubs. No casts, no damage rings, just sword and shield.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:38 pm

    During a fight, if they buff, grass, anything, they are fair game. Right now, TWoP is out. But, we are still discussing that and may include it. I'm for it with the exception of TWoP + projectile (including pyro, magic, and offensive miracles).
    avatar
    Spurgun
    Chosen Undead
    Chosen Undead


    Posts : 5553
    Reputation : 119
    Join date : 2012-01-29
    Age : 27
    Location : Finland!

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by Spurgun Sun Sep 16, 2012 7:43 pm

    I think TWoP should be allowed and you should be allowed to use projectiles/magic with it. The animation is so long that the opponent deserves to be punished if he doesn't stop it mid fight.
    DamageCK
    DamageCK
    Hollowed
    Hollowed


    Posts : 1768
    Reputation : 64
    Join date : 2012-04-15
    Age : 38
    Location : NC

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by DamageCK Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:12 pm

    I agree with that. ^ Basically, I'm for everything outside of chains and spell swapping. And healing.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:05 pm

    Technically, chains can be avoided too. There are 3 tactics. The first 2 are 50:50 chance of working (unless you study your opponent and know their chain tactic), the other one is 100% but requires you to tank a hit.

    Spell swapping is out. No arguments there.
    WyrmHero
    WyrmHero
    Lordvessel
    Lordvessel


    Posts : 8742
    Reputation : 221
    Join date : 2012-02-16
    Age : 36
    Location : The Painted World

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by WyrmHero Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:36 am

    If you're 2 handing your weapon you're f*cked. The only way is unlocking and doing nothing (maybe blocking) and I don't think it is fair at all. I only use chains in the forest because that's a war zone.
    reim0027
    reim0027
    Moderator
    Moderator


    Posts : 6715
    Reputation : 381
    Join date : 2012-01-28

    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by reim0027 Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:09 am

    I agree. Personally, I'd rather not see Chain stabs or TWoP in duelling.

    Sponsored content


    FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN - Page 5 Empty Re: FC: No Holds Barred, SL 120 and 99, PSN

    Post by Sponsored content

      Similar topics

      -

      Current date/time is Tue May 07, 2024 1:55 pm