by TehInfamousAmos Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:43 pm
Hmm, just an observation upon the quiz - what if I am unlikely to take any of the following options?
I will give my answers rather than the options then you can judge what I would be.
1.You invade the forest, two gankers charge you intentionally and are obviously going to beat you dead.
Okay, in regards to this question as an experienced forest hunter I am used to fighting 3v1's. Depending on my build I would either buff my weapon and be hyper aggressive or I would skirmish with them using my bow and poke at them with a rapier, if they come in I may backstab them to give myself a bit of relief before pulling out my murakumo (DA and Stunlock central).
2.You finally make your way up to the host and he casts TWOP and pulls out his talisman...you know whats about to happen.
I either kick or backstab the host to interrupt his TWOP
3. You invade another players world, you see that he is struggling to fend off an invading hacker, but is clearly doing it wrong and will invetibaly die.
If the hacker is a forest hunter/Darkmoon I unfortunately cannot do anything. If he is a darkwraith then I will attempt to kill him.
4.You invade to people fighting, one player is being cheap by your philosophy, and the other is not.
By my philosophy nothing is cheap in this game, tis' also just a game. People play it for fun, I will do as I wish at the time. Which is possibly kill the phantom and 1v1 the host, or if I am in the forest I will watch them fight unless there are imbalanced odds.
5. You enter a one on one duel with another player, he uses moves you deem cheap, but only by your philosophy and you lose the battle. Do you:
Look towards above answer to question in terms of not deeming people cheap. I will usually message them 'Well played' I will also state what I should have done to counter their "cheap" move and hopefully have a nice conversation with them.
[41%] 
