PETS, anyone?

Sorry...but I am sick to death of Pets in RPGs. Give me some NPC Companions...fine. But pets are just so freaking mundane and downright childish at this point. I see this crap everywhere...since when did this become a staple for RPGs? Pets...huh. Every single day...I have to hear my 10 and 5 year old nephews SCREAM over stupid pets in that stupid Wizard MMO game.

I hate to say...but pets in Dark Souls would literally be a deal breaker for me. I want my grown up game...keep the pets in crappy MMOs.

This would be really cool!! like imagine after you die, the pet can run back to the bonfire you are at and you could see it running back when you get up.

Also, each covenant should have its own selection of pets that you can only use when in that covenant.

For example, forest hunters should get falcons for tracking your prey.

Maybe they could have a heavy stat investment in order to deter you from using much else?

I'm all for the idea I think it would be great providing it's optional. I would love to get my Paku Paku to taunt my enemy and t-bag them at the end. XD

Frank_White wrote:I know it's an enemy chariot, but they did say they want to implement vehicles for players too. That means chariot, horse or something similar. They said there is a level where you are on a ship but that does not count as a vehicle, it is an area.

They literally said they were looking into the possibility of player vehicles LIKE A BOAT.

But they haven't confirmed it.

steveswede wrote:I'm all for the idea I think it would be great providing it's optional. I would love to get my Paku Paku to taunt my enemy and t-bag them at the end. XD

A pet Taun Taun, but in the snowy level you have to kill him and crawl inside his stomach for warmth.

"Curl up like a ball" for 20 seconds and you are transported into Taun Taun fantasy land.

DE5PA1R wrote:

Frank_White wrote:I know it's an enemy chariot, but they did say they want to implement vehicles for players too. That means chariot, horse or something similar. They said there is a level where you are on a ship but that does not count as a vehicle, it is an area.

They literally said they were looking into the possibility of player vehicles LIKE A BOAT.

But they haven't confirmed it.

No. You have a serious tendency to read stuff and totally misinterpret it.
They said they are hoping to implement player controlled vehicles, and that there will be a moment in the game when you are on a ship, but it will NOT be possible to control that ship. They very clearly said that you will not be able to control the boat.

In fact, I'm going to link you what Shibuya said because I know you will start arguing again saying you are right.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/383833/dark-souls-2-detailed-vehicles-next-gen-visuals-and-more/

Finally, Shibuya discussed the inclusion of vehicles: "We want to constantly think of something new that hasn't been tried before, so that's where that idea [of the chariot] came up," he explained.

"Being in a ship or boat is definitely something we are considering but being able to control one is not in the works."

Frank_White wrote:No. You have a serious tendency to read stuff and totally misinterpret it.

And here I thought that was you. How silly of me. Nice rep by the way. Remind me how you got to -15 again. (EDIT: -16, my bad)

They said they are hoping to implement player controlled vehicles

Source?

and that there will be a moment in the game when you are on a ship, but it will NOT be possible to control that ship. They very clearly said that you will not be able to control the boat.

Shibuya said he was considering the player being on a boat, and the player would not control it. This is accurate, but you're not making a point.

Frank_White wrote:In fact, I'm going to link you what Shibuya said because I know you will start arguing again saying you are right, when actually you don't know the difference between your @ss and your face.

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/383833/dark-souls-2-detailed-vehicles-next-gen-visuals-and-more/

Finally, Shibuya discussed the inclusion of vehicles: "We want to constantly think of something new that hasn't been tried before, so that's where that idea [of the chariot] came up," he explained.

"Being in a ship or boat is definitely something we are considering but being able to control one is not in the works."

That way of addressing others is unbecoming of the character of this wiki and forums. I don't expect you all to love each other like hippies, but I do expect you address each other with proper respect. Shape that up please.

It's edited now Mr. Emergence. I just can't help it, I have no respect for people who argue like grade school kids.

To DESPA1R:
I did make a point. I just proved you wrong by linking a direct quote from what Shibuya said. You said that they plan on implementing a controllable boat, Shibuya says no. Deal with it.

Frank_White wrote:It's edited now Mr. Emergence. I just can't help it, I have no respect for people who argue like grade school kids.

To DESPA1R:
I did make a point. I just proved you wrong by linking a direct quote from what Shibuya said. You said that they plan on implementing a controllable boat, Shibuya says no. Deal with it.

You need to help it. Your comments are hard to read and you can't apologize then offend all over again.
It goes, "I'm sorry, I was childish, I will try harder."

Quite Frankly, your comments don't reflect the people of this forum at all.
Most of us can debate and argue without aggression.

I hope people dont get the wrong immpression of the community here when they read your comments.
If you dont care, then leave. You are the most offensive person here imo.

ON TOPIC: Pets could be cool.

Shut-UP Animaaal! I can't stand your postings!

Animaaal wrote:

Frank_White wrote:It's edited now Mr. Emergence. I just can't help it, I have no respect for people who argue like grade school kids.

To DESPA1R:
I did make a point. I just proved you wrong by linking a direct quote from what Shibuya said. You said that they plan on implementing a controllable boat, Shibuya says no. Deal with it.

You need to help it. Your comments are hard to read and you can't apologize then offend all over again.
It goes, "I'm sorry, I was childish, I will try harder."

Quite Frankly, your comments don't reflect the people of this forum at all.
Most of us can debate and argue without aggression.

I hope people dont get the wrong immpression of the community here when they read your comments.
If you dont care, then leave. You are the most offensive person here imo.

ON TOPIC: Pets could be cool.

Not really my problem if I'm the most offensive person here. I've never insulted someone who didn't at the moment deserve it though, so don't be childish and call me childish.

I've been completely fair and nice to the posters who act reasonable, rational and nice too. But there is a few, maybe 2-3 I've got into arguments with, and let's be honest: those arguments never would've lasted if these people had a resemblance of sense and rationality in their head.

You on the other hand, need to stop acting so high and mighty. What are you, a priest?

I find that post very offensive.

To Animaaal^




I'm not gonna bother with this new guy, he is clearly to smart for me.

BIG TIME MASTER, Animaaal, and Frank_White, please treat each other with respect. How you're treating each other is going to create more resentment and pages of arguements, none of which is going to solve any problems. You've all shown yourselves to be capable of being kind and respectful; please continue to do so.

Yes, you're right.


Now get some loving:
https://soulswiki.forumotion.com/t18889-hate-mailbah-love-mail

Frank_White wrote:
Not really my problem if I'm the most offensive person here. I've never insulted someone who didn't at the moment deserve it though, so don't be childish and call me childish.

I've been completely fair and nice to the posters who act reasonable, rational and nice too. But there is a few, maybe 2-3 I've got into arguments with, and let's be honest: those arguments never would've lasted if these people had a resemblance of sense and rationality in their head.

You on the other hand, need to stop acting so high and mighty. What are you, a priest?

You are a sad, sad little man Animaaal. Just give it a rest already, you really have no obligation to continue arguments endlessly.

I wish Animaal would just shutup too man. How the heck did he get all that rep anyhow?

Haha.

I'm glad we could have a wholesome, friendly banter.
And here's to new friends!

Cheers and goodnight!