Yesuurd wrote:I think it's all up to the hosts taking score, the player with the most wins...well he wins.
Plain and simple guys so we don't get too confused, no matter if someone didn't fight someone else, at the end if that person won the most then he won the most.
I think it will have to be who has the highest percentages of wins. So as an example, if participant 1 only have 4 fights and win 3 and participant 2 has 10 fights and wins 5. Participant 1 should still be the winner since his percentages of wins would be higher. So the goal would be for everyone to have about the same number of fights. Does that make sense?