Dark souls 2: Wishlist

[quote="Marino."]Lets just drop it .
This wont get us anywhere anyway .

You offer no feedback on the topic other than to express dislike, makes it hard to actually move forward with the theory, ya know? I get that invading is precious to you- believe it or not, I think its one of the best aspects of the game. But as it stands, there is nothing stopping players like yourself from invading indeffinitely. You say that players should experience a punishing game, then contradict that statement by saying that invading should just be "fun" with the absence of punishment.

[quote="ZoltarTheDestroyer"]

Marino. wrote:Lets just drop it .
This wont get us anywhere anyway .

You offer no feedback on the topic other than to express dislike, makes it hard to actually move forward with the theory, ya know? I get that invading is precious to you- believe it or not, I think its one of the best aspects of the game. But as it stands, there is nothing stopping players like yourself from invading indeffinitely. You say that players should experience a punishing game, then contradict that statement by saying that invading should just be "fun" with the absence of punishment.

Please revert to my previous posts, i quite hope i provided alot of insight about human form etc. And other physical aspects of the game how it should, however not so that it stops people from doing it frequently, making invaders become scarce. Good day my friend.

Marino. wrote:I think i can handle it Zak

But lets just agree to disagree, From will figure something out and we're all going to buy it anyway

And i dont have any dignity left to be offended by the Internet anyway

Hmm... It seems you two are missing the point of a discussion. Theres no need to defend anyone, for the simple fact that this is by no means an attack. If my every word is going to incite the both of you, then I must take you advice and drop this issue until a later date, where perhaps someone will offer a better dialog.

[quote="ZoltarTheDestroyer"]

Marino. wrote:Lets just drop it .
This wont get us anywhere anyway .

You offer no feedback on the topic other than to express dislike, makes it hard to actually move forward with the theory, ya know? I get that invading is precious to you- believe it or not, I think its one of the best aspects of the game. But as it stands, there is nothing stopping players like yourself from invading indeffinitely. You say that players should experience a punishing game, then contradict that statement by saying that invading should just be "fun" with the absence of punishment.

Expressing dislike is feedback .
I already said what i think about it and i won't add anything to it .

PVE and PVP are different aspects of the Game to me .
I disliked the Idea of an Easy mode because i think that the PVE should be punishing and unforgiving while PVP should be measurement of Skill between Players .
And losing your Weapon would more disturb my PVP experience rather than add to it .

And i dont want my fun to be disturbed .

[quote="Marino."]

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:Lets just drop it .
This wont get us anywhere anyway .

You offer no feedback on the topic other than to express dislike, makes it hard to actually move forward with the theory, ya know? I get that invading is precious to you- believe it or not, I think its one of the best aspects of the game. But as it stands, there is nothing stopping players like yourself from invading indeffinitely. You say that players should experience a punishing game, then contradict that statement by saying that invading should just be "fun" with the absence of punishment.

Expressing dislike is feedback .
I already said what i think about it and i won't add anything to it .

PVE and PVP are different aspects of the Game to me .
I disliked the Idea of an Easy mode because i think that the PVE should be punishing and unforgiving while PVP should be measurement of Skill between Players .
And losing your Weapon would more disturb my PVP experience rather than add to it .

And i dont want my fun to be disturbed .

The whole merit of invading revolves around disturbing the "fun" of others. But we shall continue this discussion some other time, when perhaps you will better understand the other side of your arguement. But I'll ask you this- what would be your solution to 'ganking'? Or, do you not see it as a problem?

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:I think i can handle it Zak

But lets just agree to disagree, From will figure something out and we're all going to buy it anyway

And i dont have any dignity left to be offended by the Internet anyway

Hmm... It seems you two are missing the point of a discussion. Theres no need to defend anyone, for the simple fact that this is by no means an attack. If my every word is going to incite the both of you, then I must take you advice and drop this issue until a later date, where perhaps someone will offer a better dialog.

I know when a discussion will lead us to nowhere .

Just open a thread about this issue you have with Invading and i will stay away from it if it pleases you .

[quote="ZoltarTheDestroyer"]

Marino. wrote:

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:Lets just drop it .
This wont get us anywhere anyway .

You offer no feedback on the topic other than to express dislike, makes it hard to actually move forward with the theory, ya know? I get that invading is precious to you- believe it or not, I think its one of the best aspects of the game. But as it stands, there is nothing stopping players like yourself from invading indeffinitely. You say that players should experience a punishing game, then contradict that statement by saying that invading should just be "fun" with the absence of punishment.

Expressing dislike is feedback .
I already said what i think about it and i won't add anything to it .

PVE and PVP are different aspects of the Game to me .
I disliked the Idea of an Easy mode because i think that the PVE should be punishing and unforgiving while PVP should be measurement of Skill between Players .
And losing your Weapon would more disturb my PVP experience rather than add to it .

And i dont want my fun to be disturbed .

The whole merit of invading revolves around disturbing the "fun" of others. But we shall continue this discussion some other time, when perhaps you will better understand the other side of your arguement. But I'll ask you this- what would be your solution to 'ganking'? Or, do you not see it as a problem?

I dont . I actually enjoy a 1vs3 fight since it tends to get pretty intense .

Its just a game, theres not much to think about it for me .

Now i have a Question .
Why is Invading disturbing someone else's fun when Invading is part of the Game ?

This has gotten off topic completely guys , its no longer the wishlist, your right Marino, post a new thread about this.

Marino. wrote:

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:I think i can handle it Zak

But lets just agree to disagree, From will figure something out and we're all going to buy it anyway

And i dont have any dignity left to be offended by the Internet anyway

Hmm... It seems you two are missing the point of a discussion. Theres no need to defend anyone, for the simple fact that this is by no means an attack. If my every word is going to incite the both of you, then I must take you advice and drop this issue until a later date, where perhaps someone will offer a better dialog.

I know when a discussion will lead us to nowhere .

Just open a thread about this issue you have with Invading and i will stay away from it if it pleases you .

That wouldnt please me at all! Debating builds a better man. Through reading your posts I better understand your point of view. And through your rebuttles, I better understand my own point of view. So thank you sir! And if I do create a thread regarding this topic, it can only exist with people like you opposing my oppinions.

and the moderators get onto me about stuff x) lol kids these days

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:

ZoltarTheDestroyer wrote:

Marino. wrote:I think i can handle it Zak

But lets just agree to disagree, From will figure something out and we're all going to buy it anyway

And i dont have any dignity left to be offended by the Internet anyway

Hmm... It seems you two are missing the point of a discussion. Theres no need to defend anyone, for the simple fact that this is by no means an attack. If my every word is going to incite the both of you, then I must take you advice and drop this issue until a later date, where perhaps someone will offer a better dialog.

I know when a discussion will lead us to nowhere .

Just open a thread about this issue you have with Invading and i will stay away from it if it pleases you .

That wouldnt please me at all! Debating builds a better man. Through reading your posts I better understand your point of view. And through your rebuttles, I better understand my own point of view. So thank you sir! And if I do create a thread regarding this topic, it can only exist with people like you opposing my oppinions.

I'm not sure what i did exactly but it seems my strategy at life (running in one direction screaming) works

I'm glad this worked out so well

jesus the quotes quoting quotes quoting quotes STAHP

Acarnatia wrote:Will you guys PLEASE CUT IT OUT? Zakkia is right; this is just getting off topic and the only reason this isn't 'flaming' is because your language is polite. Please keep the thread on topic and aggression-free.

Not if i can gain a friend .
Arguments like this form a community .
I had no intention of "flaming" him or anyone and i think Zoltar didnt either .

Marino. wrote:

Acarnatia wrote:Will you guys PLEASE CUT IT OUT? Zakkia is right; this is just getting off topic and the only reason this isn't 'flaming' is because your language is polite. Please keep the thread on topic and aggression-free.

Not if i can gain a friend .
Arguments like this form a community .
I had no intention of "flaming" him or anyone and i think Zoltar didnt either .

Hmm... I thought it was a great debate. But I apologize if it got off topic. But no, my intention wasnt to 'flame'.

You know what I want. The ability to make a charecter w/o making him look like this:

Perfectly fine Oblivion face to me

I want This to be foredefined Face .

I actually wouldn't mind some music in the background. Nothing really grand of course, just some soft piano or some other instrument to match where you're exploring around.

Mind you, I enjoy what From did with the realism of not playing music other than boss fights and cutscenes, but it'd be nice to hear a tiny bit of something once in a while.

xbox has custom soundtrack on every game why cant ps3 >.> killzone does it

If there is going to be background music it should emcompass(?) lonelness(?), sadness or anything that is not lively unless it's a cutscene. The games are to make us feel alone, scared, not going down the yellow brick road in the Wizard of Oz. I always play Lullaby of Deserted Hell from touhou when I'm in the Demon ruins through Lost Izalith. Fits the mood of going into hell.

Yea a nice slow piano would be nice in places like anor londo and other music for other plces of course.

Oh that would be great to do. Music does not need to be a orchestra to sound good, keep it simple. You know what would be a good idea: There are two anor londo's one light, and one dark, so do something similar and create two different music pieces for each one.

I really enjoyed Dark Souls to begin with, so i don't have much i demand, however, while i loved Dark Souls, i feel like the atmosphere and setting didn't fully manage to catch my interest, however, watching the trailer for Dark Souls 2, i'm really hoping they live up to what that trailer ''promised'' if that makes any sense. As for equipment, that armor set the character in the trailer wears, or actually, the armor sets all characters wear looks damn awesome! So i hope there will be lots of that kind of stuff in the game. I also hope there won't be a best weapon of each type or atleast a better one like in Dark Souls. While it was all about gameplay, it always felt like there were atleast some weapons that were slightly worse than the other or just had a horribly dull and bad moveset, like the Mace. I would've loved to use that weapon if it weren't for that awfully dull moveset or the Silver Knight Sword. And while i'm not saying the SKS was bad, there sure were better weapons of choice. Other than that i think i would like seeing a more realistic change in the weight system. Like heavy armor is heavy, medium is medium and light is light but perhaps taking it further like ''heavy light'', ''medium-light'' or i don't know. I've seen far too much fast rollers with heavy or just partly heavy armor, and it has bothered me far too much, but honestly, in the end i don't mind. Dark Souls is Dark Souls, and if they can atleast live up to that name, then i'm happy with it.

I WANT BADASS SHIELDS!

And I want DeS Knight/ Fluted Armour back! THAT WAS ALSO BAD ***! Dks knight and elite knight armour doesnt compare!

ViralEnsign_ wrote:I WANT BADASS SHIELDS!

And I want DeS Knight/ Fluted Armour back! THAT WAS ALSO BAD ***! Dks knight and elite knight armour doesnt compare!

And I wanted gloom, brushwood and shaman (that pimp collar) but NoOoOoOo!