Frank_White wrote:...I think though that whoever dies in PvP, invader or host should permanently lose their souls...
No effin way. Not EVER. I want the one more chance to get my bloodstain (also love the concept behind calling it a "bloodstain") back, after that, then fine. Bloodstain apart of souls, bloodstain stays.
It would encourage mindless spending, and cripple the ability to stock pile and level up. Do the math, you really wanna do it twice? No way man.
Frank_White wrote:...Of course we want harder bosses, they're all ABSURDLY easy except for Ornstein & Smough...
This is such a misconception. If they are easy for you, then they are easy for me for the same reasons. Same reason the Bosses in DeS got easier, and any game for that matter imo....practice.
Who cares if they make easy mode for people? I'll make it hard on myself...and you. When you meet me, you certainly wont be thinkin easy mode, oooo no :evil: (by you I mean anyone)
Does anyone really care? Theres gonna be ng +, ng +++, etcetcetc. Whatever they do it will be fine, I have zero worries about this issue. My opinon of course.
@ArchandesFirst of, very good work. Very descriptive, well thought out, and self-critiqued before posting. Bravo to you for not posting a bunch of garbage. I agree/disagree, of course, and would like to gloss over some examples.
AGREE: Summoning higher soul levels....yes. Not about the entire idea parameters though. If anything I would like to see a “wide open” filtering process, but only with the ability for the host to summon in a descending fashion. Sorry bud, you cant find another helper at 4 kings (for example), tough. You can have another one, but only a newbie…seems soulish to me that way.
AGREE: Better chat for sure. Voice chat?!?!...I’m unsure about that one at the moment. I don’t see any harm in it I suppose.
DISAGREE: Survival modes…just no. Maybe Demon’s Souls 4.
DISAGREE: Anything to do a the shield preventing backstab damage. Connecting something as crucial as “balancing backstabs” to a shield would wreck it. You might as well say you can only equip the RoFaP with a shield. 97% would have a shield…catch my drift?
AGREE/DISAGREE: Rapidfire bows. I’m eatin people alive with my bows as is. Especially when you get the head shots down. Bows are meant to tease. Maybe shoot 2 arrows simultaneously at the cost of range?
AGREE: SPELL RECHARGE, I really really really really really really really really think this is a good idea. Someone in another thread said (OH UBLUG) recharge when you pick up a bloodstain. Any form of this that isn’t as simple as using an item or killing an enemy I’m prolly all for.
DISAGREE: That spells or “castings” cost stamina. Unless they actually made casting a “weapon” so to speak, in other words, a true mage…not a spellsword, I’d be all for it. I use castings now to regen stamina as an intentional tactic.
Again, this is glossing over a lot of information. As I reread I'm sure I'll agree/disagree with more. Thanks for taking the time o contribute. I enjoy the way you articulate.
@Frank_White
You should be careful who you claim to speak for...
I DEFINITELY want some of those ideas implemented. No offense, but did you read it?
I DEFINITELY DONT WANT THE SHIELD/BACKSTAB THING! YES I'M SHOUTING.
No smarter bosses (unecessary)...did I mention the shield on your back thing?
Last edited by Animaaal on Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:45 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : selling/structure/grammer)